Skip to main content

Greenland’s ice Loss is Worse Than We Thought

Climate change is the single greatest threat facing our planet today. Thanks to excess carbon emissions that have been growing steadily since the mid-20th century, average temperatures continue to rise worldwide. This leads to feedback mechanisms, such as rising sea levels, extreme weather, drought, wildfires, and glacial melting. This includes the Arctic Ice Pack, the East Antarctic glacier, and the Greenland Ice Sheet (GrIS), which are rapidly melting and increasing global sea levels.

Worse than that, the disappearance of the world’s ice sheets means that Earth’s surface and oceans absorb more heat, driving global temperatures even further. According to a new NASA-supported study by an international team of Earth scientists and glaciologists, the Greenland Ice Sheet is melting at an accelerating rate, much faster than existing models predict. According to these findings, far more ice will be lost from Greenland during the 21st century, which means its contribution to sea-level rise will be significantly higher.

The team consisted of researchers from the National Space Institute at the Technical University of Denmark (DTU Space), the Glaciology Section at the Alfred Wegener Institute (AWI), the Institut des Géosciences de l’Environnement at the Université Grenoble Alpes, the University of Copenhagen, Dartmouth College, University of California Irvine (UC Irvine), and NASA’s Jet Propulsion Laboratory (NASA JPL). Their paper, titled “Extensive inland thinning and speed-up of Northeast Greenland Ice Stream,” recently appeared in Nature.

Located in northeast Greenland, the Zachariae Isstrom glacier (Isstrøm meaning “ice stream” in Danish) has been steadily melting for the past two decades. In 2012, the floating extensions collapsed, and this glacier has since retreated inland at an accelerating pace. Due to the low levels of precipitation in this region (known as the “Arctic desert”), the ice sheet is not regenerating enough to mitigate this melt. However, scientists have had difficulty measuring how much ice is lost a year since the ice sheet’s interior – which moves less than one meter (3.3 feet) per year – is difficult to monitor.

Nevertheless, previous models that estimated the amount of ice lost appeared to have vastly underestimated the problem. According to Shfaqat Abbas Khan, a DTU Space professor, and the study’s lead author, the situation is significantly worse. “Our previous projections of ice loss in Greenland until 2100 are vastly underestimated,” he said. “Models are mainly tuned to observations at the front of the ice sheet, which is easily accessible, and where, visibly, a lot is happening.”

The NASA-supported study is partly based on data collected by the Global Navigation Satellite System (GNSS), a network of precise GPS stations reaching as far as 200 km (124 mi) inland on the Northeast Greenland Ice Stream. This was combined with high-resolution numerical modeling and surface-elevation data obtained by the ESA’s CryoSat-2 satellite, an Earth Explorer Mission (EEM) dedicated to measuring polar sea ice thickness and monitoring changes in ice sheets. As Khan explained:

“Our data show us that what we see happening at the front reaches far back into the heart of the ice sheet. We can see that the entire basin is thinning, and the surface speed is accelerating. Every year the glaciers we’ve studied have retreated further inland, and we predict that this will continue over the coming decades and centuries. Under present-day climate forcing, it is difficult to conceive how this retreat could stop.”

Daily melt area for Greenland from April 1 to Oct. 31, 2022, with daily melt area for the preceding five years. Credit: NSIDC/T. Mote, University of Georgia

Study co-author Mathieu Morlighem, a professor of earth sciences at Dartmouth College, said:

“It is truly amazing that we are able to detect a subtle speed change from high-precision GPS data, which ultimately, when combined with a model of ice flow, inform us on how the glacier slides on its bed. It is possible that what we find in northeast Greenland may be happening in other sectors of the ice sheet. Many glaciers have been accelerating and thinning near the margin in recent decades. GPS data helps us detect how far this acceleration propagates inland, potentially 200-300 km from the coast. If this is correct, the contribution from ice dynamics to the overall mass loss of Greenland will be larger than what current models suggest.”

According to their results, the Northeast Greenland Ice Stream will add between 13.5 to 15.5 mm by 2100 – six times higher than previous models suggested. This is equivalent to the Greenland ice sheet’s contribution to the North Atlantic for the past 50 years. According to the Sixth Assessment Report (AR6) by the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC), global sea levels are expected to rise by 22 to 98 cm (8.66 to 35.58 inches) by the end of the century.

But as more precise observations of changes in ice velocity are included in climate models, these estimates will likely need to be adjusted upwards. Said co-author Eric Rignot, professor of Earth system science at the UC Irvine:

“We foresee profound changes in global sea levels, more than currently projected by existing models. Data collected in the vast interior of ice sheets, such as those described herein, help us better represent the physical processes included in numerical models and in turn provide more realistic projections of global sea-level rise.”

Further Reading: Eurekalert, Nature

The post Greenland’s ice Loss is Worse Than We Thought appeared first on Universe Today.



from Universe Today https://ift.tt/97pxfBF
via IFTTT

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

More Data and Machine Learning has Kicked SETI Into High Gear

For over sixty years, astronomers and astrophysicists have been engaged in the Search for Extraterrestrial Intelligence (SETI). This consists of listening to other star systems for signs of technological activity (or “technosignatures), such as radio transmissions. This first attempt was in 1960, known as Project Ozma, where famed SETI researcher Dr. Frank Drake (father of the Drake Equation) and his colleagues used the Robert C. Byrd Green Bank Telescope in West Virginia to conduct a radio survey of Tau Ceti and Epsilon Eridani. Since then, the vast majority of SETI surveys have similarly looked for narrowband radio signals since they are very good at propagating through interstellar space. However, the biggest challenge has always been how to filter out radio transmissions on Earth – aka. radio frequency interference (RFI). In a recent study, an international team led by the Dunlap Institute for Astronomy and Astrophysics (DIAA) applied a new deep-learning algorithm to data collecte...

eROSITA Sees Changes in the Most Powerful Quasar

After almost seventy years of study, astronomers are still fascinated by active galactic nuclei (AGN), otherwise known as quasi-stellar objects (or “quasars.”) These are the result of supermassive black holes (SMBHs) at the center of massive galaxies, which cause gas and dust to fall in around them and form accretion disks. The material in these disks is accelerated to close to the speed of light, causing it to release tremendous amounts of radiation in the visible, radio, infrared, ultraviolet, gamma-ray, and X-ray wavelengths. In fact, quasars are so bright that they temporarily outshine every star in their host galaxy’s disk combined. The brightest quasar observed to date, 100,000 billion times as luminous as our Sun, is known as SMSS J114447.77-430859.3 (J1144). This AGN is hosted by a galaxy located roughly 9.6 billion light years from Earth between the constellations Centaurus and Hydra. Using data from the eROSITA All Sky Survey and other space telescopes, an international t...

Planetary Surfaces: Why study them? Can they help us find life elsewhere?

Universe Today recently explored the importance of studying impact craters and what they can teach us about finding life beyond Earth. Impact craters are considered one of the many surface processes—others include volcanism, weathering, erosion, and plate tectonics—that shape surfaces on numerous planetary bodies, with all of them simultaneously occurring on Earth. Here, we will explore how and why planetary scientists study planetary surfaces, the challenges faced when studying other planetary surfaces, what planetary surfaces can teach us about finding life, and how upcoming students can pursue studying planetary surfaces, as well. So, why is it so important to study planetary surfaces throughout the solar system? “Planetary surfaces record the history of the Solar System, a history that’s almost entirely lost to us here on Earth,” Dr. Paul Byrne, who is an Associate Professor of Earth, Environmental, and Planetary Sciences at Washington University in St. Louis, tells  Uni...