Skip to main content

Perhaps a Supervoid Doesn’t Explain the Mysterious CMB Cold Spot

For years cosmologists had thought that a strange feature appearing in the microwave sky, known as the CMB cold spot, was due to the light passing through a giant supervoid. But new research casts that conclusion into doubt.

The cosmic microwave background (CMB) is the single greatest source of light in all the universe. It completely permeates all of space and is made of light leftover from when the cosmos was only 380,000 years old. At that time our universe had expanded and cooled to the point that it could transition from a hot dense plasma into a slightly cooler, but neutral, gas. That process released white-hot radiation with a temperature of around 10,000 K. In the intervening 13.8 billion years, however, that radiation has cooled and redshifted down to around three degrees above absolute zero, which puts that radiation firmly in the microwave regime.

Within that light there are tiny bumps, wiggles, and variations in brightness. These variations spread across the sky and are incredibly tiny, with differences no bigger than one part in 100,000. These variations represent tiny density differences in the early universe that would eventually grow up to become galaxies and clusters. Cosmologists understand the statistical properties of these bumps and wiggles to a great degree, but there is one significant outlier known as the cold spot.

The cold spot is about 10° across, and while it is not exceptionally cold, the combination of its lower temperature and its enormous size puts it outside of what we’d expect from our standard model of cosmology.

One plausible hypothesis to explain the cold spot is that the light in that direction of the cosmic microwave background has traveled through a very large patch of the universe that is less dense than average, something called a supervoid.

Because the supervoid is so large, it takes an enormous amount of time for light to cross it. And during that time the void itself grows larger and deeper as the universe evolves. That means that when the light entered the supervoid, the void was smaller than when the light exited. This difference saps energy from the radiation, causing it to cool and redshift more than the average for the rest of the CMB.

Galaxy surveys have shown the potential presence of a supervoid in the direction of the cold spot. But a new study shows that the known supervoids in that direction can only explain a fraction of the size and temperature of the cold spot. Indeed, the new analysis shows that there cannot be a large enough supervoid in that direction, even one hidden behind the limits of our current observational capabilities.

The new research does not propose a solution to the cold spot mystery, but it does tell us that we have a lot more to learn.

The post Perhaps a Supervoid Doesn’t Explain the Mysterious CMB Cold Spot appeared first on Universe Today.



from Universe Today https://ift.tt/UgD2Yzw
via IFTTT
Labels:

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

More Data and Machine Learning has Kicked SETI Into High Gear

For over sixty years, astronomers and astrophysicists have been engaged in the Search for Extraterrestrial Intelligence (SETI). This consists of listening to other star systems for signs of technological activity (or “technosignatures), such as radio transmissions. This first attempt was in 1960, known as Project Ozma, where famed SETI researcher Dr. Frank Drake (father of the Drake Equation) and his colleagues used the Robert C. Byrd Green Bank Telescope in West Virginia to conduct a radio survey of Tau Ceti and Epsilon Eridani. Since then, the vast majority of SETI surveys have similarly looked for narrowband radio signals since they are very good at propagating through interstellar space. However, the biggest challenge has always been how to filter out radio transmissions on Earth – aka. radio frequency interference (RFI). In a recent study, an international team led by the Dunlap Institute for Astronomy and Astrophysics (DIAA) applied a new deep-learning algorithm to data collecte...
Post a Comment
Read more

eROSITA Sees Changes in the Most Powerful Quasar

After almost seventy years of study, astronomers are still fascinated by active galactic nuclei (AGN), otherwise known as quasi-stellar objects (or “quasars.”) These are the result of supermassive black holes (SMBHs) at the center of massive galaxies, which cause gas and dust to fall in around them and form accretion disks. The material in these disks is accelerated to close to the speed of light, causing it to release tremendous amounts of radiation in the visible, radio, infrared, ultraviolet, gamma-ray, and X-ray wavelengths. In fact, quasars are so bright that they temporarily outshine every star in their host galaxy’s disk combined. The brightest quasar observed to date, 100,000 billion times as luminous as our Sun, is known as SMSS J114447.77-430859.3 (J1144). This AGN is hosted by a galaxy located roughly 9.6 billion light years from Earth between the constellations Centaurus and Hydra. Using data from the eROSITA All Sky Survey and other space telescopes, an international t...
Post a Comment
Read more

Planetary Surfaces: Why study them? Can they help us find life elsewhere?

Universe Today recently explored the importance of studying impact craters and what they can teach us about finding life beyond Earth. Impact craters are considered one of the many surface processes—others include volcanism, weathering, erosion, and plate tectonics—that shape surfaces on numerous planetary bodies, with all of them simultaneously occurring on Earth. Here, we will explore how and why planetary scientists study planetary surfaces, the challenges faced when studying other planetary surfaces, what planetary surfaces can teach us about finding life, and how upcoming students can pursue studying planetary surfaces, as well. So, why is it so important to study planetary surfaces throughout the solar system? “Planetary surfaces record the history of the Solar System, a history that’s almost entirely lost to us here on Earth,” Dr. Paul Byrne, who is an Associate Professor of Earth, Environmental, and Planetary Sciences at Washington University in St. Louis, tells  Uni...
Post a Comment
Read more