Skip to main content

Earliest Supermassive Black Holes Were “Shockingly Normal”

The early Universe is a puzzling and—in many ways—still-unknown place. The first billion years of cosmic history saw the explosive creation of stars and the growth of the first galaxies. It’s also a time when the earliest known black holes appeared to grow very massive quickly. Astronomers want to know how they grew and why they feed more like “normal” recent supermassive black holes (SMBH).

Today we see SMBH in galaxies that can have upwards of millions or billions of solar masses sequestered away. Astronomers naturally assumed that it took a long time for such monsters to build up. Like billions of years. So, when JWST observed the most distant quasar J1120+0641, they expected to see an active galactic nucleus as it looked some 770 million years after the Big Bang. That is, they expected a still-growing central supermassive black hole. They were intrigued to find that it had a mass of at least a billion suns.

This image of ULAS J1120+0641, a very distant quasar powered by a black hole, was created from images taken from surveys made by both the Sloan Digital Sky Survey and the UKIRT Infrared Deep Sky Survey. The quasar appears as a faint red dot close to the centre. This quasar is the most distant yet found and is seen as it was just 770 million years after the Big Bang.
This image of ULAS J1120+0641, a very distant quasar powered by a black hole, was created from images taken from surveys made by both the Sloan Digital Sky Survey and the UKIRT Infrared Deep Sky Survey. The quasar appears as a faint red dot close to the center. It’s the most distant yet found, seen as it was 770 million years after the Big Bang.

That raised a question: how could such an early SMBH get so big so fast? For something that young, having that much mass says something about its feeding mechanism. Astronomers already know that SMBH existed early in cosmic time. These structures at the hearts of those distant quasars apparently already existed when the Universe was very young—about 5% of its current age.

Theory vs Observation: How Do Supermassive Black Holes Form?

The growth of SMBH in the early Universe is a hot topic these days. The standard idea for a long time was that they grew slowly through mergers and acquisitions during galaxy formation. Since those mergers take a long time—millions of years, at least—it seemed that the black holes would go along for the long, slow ride. And, you can’t speed up black hole growth too much once one forms. As matter swirls into the black hole, it does so through the accretion disk that feeds it. The disk—the active galactic nucleus—is very bright due to the radiation emitted as the matter heats up through friction and magnetic field interactions. The light pressure pushes stuff away. That limits how quickly the black hole can eat. Still, astronomers found these early SMBH sporting 10 billion solar masses when, by conventional wisdom, they should have been less massive.

For J1120+0641, astronomers considered different scenarios for its growth, including a so-called “ultra-effective feeding mode”. That implies early SMBH had some very efficient way of accreting gas and dust and other material. So, astronomers looked at these active galactic nuclei at the hearts of distant quasars in more detail using JWST. It has the MIRI spectrograph that looks at the light from those quasars in great detail. The MIRI spectra of J1120+0641 revealed the presence of a large dust torus (a donut-shaped ring) surrounding the accretion disk of the SMBH. That disk is feeding the SMBH at a very “normal” rate similar to SMBH in the “modern” Universe. The quasar’s broad-line region, where clumps of gas orbit the black hole at speeds near the speed of light look normal, too.

Artist’s interpretation of ULAS J1120+0641, a very distant quasar with a supermassive black hole at its heart. Credit: ESO/M. Kornmesser
Artist’s interpretation of ULAS J1120+0641, a very distant quasar with a supermassive black hole at its heart. Credit: ESO/M. Kornmesser

In the Final Analysis

By almost all the properties that can be deduced from the spectrum, J1120+0641 turns out to be feeding no differently than quasars at later times. So, what does that mean for theories of SMBH formation in the early Universe? According to Sarah Bosman, who headed up the team that used JWST to study this and other quasars, the observations rule out fast feeding and other explanations for why the SMBH is so massive. “Overall, the new observations only add to the mystery: early quasars were shockingly normal. No matter in which wavelengths we observe them, quasars are nearly identical at all epochs of the Universe,” she said.

If you extrapolate these observations to other ideas about early SMBH, it means the process of black hole growth was pretty much set early in cosmic history. They didn’t start as stellar-mass black holes that got big. Instead, they formed from the collapse of very massive early clouds of gas to become massive primordial seeds. From there, not only did they feed from their accretion disks, but probably did grow even more massive through those mergers and acquisitions. Thanks to JWST, however, astronomers now know that the early feeding mechanisms were already in place very early in cosmic time. Now they just need to figure out when the primordial seeds of SMBH first appeared in the infant Universe.

For More Information

A Black Hole of Inexplicable Mass
A Mature Quasar at Cosmic Dawn Revealed by JWST Rest-frame Infrared Spectroscopy
First rest-frame Infrared Spectrum of a Z > 7 Quasar: JWST/MRS Observations of J1120+0641

The post Earliest Supermassive Black Holes Were “Shockingly Normal” appeared first on Universe Today.



from Universe Today https://ift.tt/pcs3Ttg
via IFTTT
Labels:

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

More Data and Machine Learning has Kicked SETI Into High Gear

For over sixty years, astronomers and astrophysicists have been engaged in the Search for Extraterrestrial Intelligence (SETI). This consists of listening to other star systems for signs of technological activity (or “technosignatures), such as radio transmissions. This first attempt was in 1960, known as Project Ozma, where famed SETI researcher Dr. Frank Drake (father of the Drake Equation) and his colleagues used the Robert C. Byrd Green Bank Telescope in West Virginia to conduct a radio survey of Tau Ceti and Epsilon Eridani. Since then, the vast majority of SETI surveys have similarly looked for narrowband radio signals since they are very good at propagating through interstellar space. However, the biggest challenge has always been how to filter out radio transmissions on Earth – aka. radio frequency interference (RFI). In a recent study, an international team led by the Dunlap Institute for Astronomy and Astrophysics (DIAA) applied a new deep-learning algorithm to data collecte...
Post a Comment
Read more

eROSITA Sees Changes in the Most Powerful Quasar

After almost seventy years of study, astronomers are still fascinated by active galactic nuclei (AGN), otherwise known as quasi-stellar objects (or “quasars.”) These are the result of supermassive black holes (SMBHs) at the center of massive galaxies, which cause gas and dust to fall in around them and form accretion disks. The material in these disks is accelerated to close to the speed of light, causing it to release tremendous amounts of radiation in the visible, radio, infrared, ultraviolet, gamma-ray, and X-ray wavelengths. In fact, quasars are so bright that they temporarily outshine every star in their host galaxy’s disk combined. The brightest quasar observed to date, 100,000 billion times as luminous as our Sun, is known as SMSS J114447.77-430859.3 (J1144). This AGN is hosted by a galaxy located roughly 9.6 billion light years from Earth between the constellations Centaurus and Hydra. Using data from the eROSITA All Sky Survey and other space telescopes, an international t...
Post a Comment
Read more

Planetary Surfaces: Why study them? Can they help us find life elsewhere?

Universe Today recently explored the importance of studying impact craters and what they can teach us about finding life beyond Earth. Impact craters are considered one of the many surface processes—others include volcanism, weathering, erosion, and plate tectonics—that shape surfaces on numerous planetary bodies, with all of them simultaneously occurring on Earth. Here, we will explore how and why planetary scientists study planetary surfaces, the challenges faced when studying other planetary surfaces, what planetary surfaces can teach us about finding life, and how upcoming students can pursue studying planetary surfaces, as well. So, why is it so important to study planetary surfaces throughout the solar system? “Planetary surfaces record the history of the Solar System, a history that’s almost entirely lost to us here on Earth,” Dr. Paul Byrne, who is an Associate Professor of Earth, Environmental, and Planetary Sciences at Washington University in St. Louis, tells  Uni...
Post a Comment
Read more